Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  Wagner v. State
Wagner v. State
Wagner v. State Cartoons

Wagner v. State

Silent witness theory. Pictorial evidence is admissible if there is an adequate foundation attesting to accuracy of process that produced image.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Cruz v. New York
Cruz v. New York
Confessions of nontestifying co-defendants are inadmissible, even if they interlock with defendants own confession.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Expert testimony must reflect scientific knowledge must be relevant to proposing party's case. Daubert test.
Simms v. Dixon
Simms v. Dixon
Foundation; authentication. Photograph is authenticated for evidentiary purposes if witness with knowledge of facts is able to testify that photograph is correct portrayal of those facts. Foundation.
Seiler v. Lucasfilm
Seiler v. Lucasfilm
Best evidence rule. When contents of written document or equivalent are at issue, contents must be proved by original document unless original is unavailable for some reason that is not fault of proponent. Infringement.
United States v. Zolin
United States v. Zolin
Court should undertake in camera review of evidence to determine if crime fraud exception will bar claim of attorney client privilege only if there is factual showing adequate to support good faith belief that review may reveal evidence of fraud.
Commonwealth v. Stockhammer
Commonwealth v. Stockhammer
When defendant requests access to privileged records, counsel for defendant should be allowed to examine records in order to determine what is necessary for defense.
Johnson v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc.
Johnson v. Hillcrest Health Center, Inc.
Expert testimony is not necessary in medical malpractice case to show standard of care or deviations from that, if common knowledge of laypersons would enable jury to determine applicable standard of care and whether breach caused injury.
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause
Crawford v. Washington; for out-of-court statement to be admitted into evidence, the witness must be unavailable and the defendant must have had a prior opportunity to cross-examine the declarant.
Crime Fraud Exception
Crime Fraud Exception
United States v. Zolin; The court should undertake an in camera review of evidence to determine if the crime-fraud exception will bar a claim of attorney-client privilege.
Innocence Project
Innocence Project
Peterson v. Bernardi; DNA evidence; testing evidence to prove innocence of convicted prisoner.
Doctor Patient Privilege
Doctor Patient Privilege
United States v. Tome; physician patient privilege; statement to physician; hearsay rule; information required for diagnosis or treatment; Fed. R. Evid. 803(4).
Lab Report Admissable Evidence
Lab Report Admissable Evidence
Williams v. Illinois; Confrontation Clause; admission of DNA evidence; laboratory report; forensics report; DNA match; sexual assualt medical evidence.