Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Wheat v. United States
Wheat v. United States
Wheat v. United States Cartoons

Wheat v. United States

The sixth amendment does not afford a defendant the right to chosen counsel when a conflict of interest may arise.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

United States v. Harrington
United States v. Harrington
Sentencing guidelines often produce harsh results that are patently unfair because they fail to take into account individual circumstances.
Blockburger v. United States
Blockburger v. United States
Continuing offense; separate and distinct offenses, even if of the same nature, do not constitute a continuing offense, such as two sales of narcotics to the same purchaser, but at different times. The narcotics act penalizes each individual sale.
Sixth Amendment Right to Representation of Counsel
Sixth Amendment Right to Representation of Counsel
United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez; wrongful denial of the right to counsel of the defendant's choosing is a structural error (fundamental error) not subject to harmless-error review; pro hac vice.
Waiving Right to Counsel Post Indictment
Waiving Right to Counsel Post Indictment
Patterson v. Illinois; Whatever warnings suffice for Miranda's purposes will also be sufficient to safeguard the right to counsel in the context of post-indictment questioning; indict; sixth amendment.
Knock and Announce
Knock and Announce
United States v. Banks; Fourth Amendment; officers knocked and announced and then forcibly entered after reasonable suspicion of exigency had ripened.
Search Warrant
Search Warrant
Illinois v. McArthur; a person may be kept out of his home while the police obtain a search warrant.
Checkpoints
Checkpoints
Illinois v. Lidster; traffic checkpoints may be part of a criminal investigation.
Age as Miranda Custody Factor
Age as Miranda Custody Factor
J.D.B. v. North Carolina; A child's age properly informs the Miranda custody analysis because children may not feel free to terminate interrogation.
Invoke Miranda Rights
Invoke Miranda Rights
Berghuis v. Thompkins; a suspect invoking his Miranda rights must do so unambiguously.
Communicate Plea Bargain
Communicate Plea Bargain
Missouri v. Frye; ineffective assistance of counsel; communicate plea offer; Strickland standard; Strickland prejudice.
Eyewitness Identification
Eyewitness Identification
Perry v. New Hampshire; suppress evidence of eyewitness identification; overly suggestive; police standing with suspect; reliability of identification; Due Process.
Strickland
Strickland
Padilla v. Kentucky; a criminal defense attorney fails to provide effective assistance if the attorney misleads a noncitizen client regarding the removal consequences of a conviction. Strickland Sixth Amendment right to counsel.