Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Civil Procedure  >  Amount in Controversy Calculation
Amount in Controversy Calculation
Amount in Controversy Calculation Cartoons

Amount in Controversy Calculation

Freeland v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co.; to support diversity jurisdiction, amount in controversy is the value of the consequences that may result from the litigation.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Wilson v. Olathe Bank
Wilson v. Olathe Bank
Movants, protective order, federal rule of civil procedure 30(b)(2), record a deposition by nonstenographic means and is given the choice of the method of recording, absent annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, and undue burden or expense.
Collateral Estoppel
Collateral Estoppel
Kovach v. District of Columbia; doctrine of res judicata, or claim preclusion; final judgment on the merits precludes relitigation between the same parties concerning the same factual transaction.
Failure To Warn Lawsuit
Failure To Warn Lawsuit
United Oil Co. v. Parts Associates, Inc.; may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, relevant to claim or defense; other lawsuits regarding similar products relevant to a defendant's failure to warn; indemnify; indemnity agreement.
Short and Plain Statement of Even A Fraud Claim
Short and Plain Statement of Even A Fraud Claim
Denny v. Carey; Rule 9(b)'s requirement of pleading fraud with particularity must be harmonized with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8's requirement of short and plain statement of the plaintiff's claim that is simple, concise, and direct; on information and belief.
Courts May Use Non-Court Personnel
Courts May Use Non-Court Personnel
In re Peterson; The Seventh Amendment does not prohibit the introduction of new methods for determining what facts are in issue, nor new rules of evidence.
Compulsory Counterclaim
Compulsory Counterclaim
Podhorn v. Paragon Group, Inc; A defendant's claims against a plaintiff must be asserted as a counterclaim if arise out of the transaction or occurrence and do not require the presence of third parties over whom the court lacks jurisdiction.
Duty To Maintain All Material Evidence
Duty To Maintain All Material Evidence
Teague v. Target Corp; Spoliation is the destruction or material alteration of evidence or the failure to preserve property for another\'s use as evidence in pending or reasonably foreseeable litigation; mitigation-of-damages doctrine.
State Class Action Lawsuits
State Class Action Lawsuits
Preston v. Tenet Healthsystem Memorial Medical Center, Inc; The Class Action Fairness Act (CAFA) creates a narrow exception to federal jurisdiction and allows the discretionary remand of purely local actions.
State a Claim
State a Claim
Ashcroft v. Iqbal; pleading; facts to support claim; insufficient pleading.
Electronic Discovery
Electronic Discovery
Helmert v. Butterball, LLC; e-discovery; unduly burdensome electronic discovery request.
Nerve Center Test
Nerve Center Test
Hertz Corporation v. Friend; Diversity Jurisdiction; a corporation's nerve center is its principal place of business for purposes of diversity jurisdiction.
Contention Interrogatories
Contention Interrogatories
Cable & Computer Technology, Inc. v. Lockheed Saunders, Inc.; Rule 33 states that an interrogatory is not objectionable because it asks for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact.