Barker v. Wingo

Description
Customer Reviews

For speedy trial claims, courts must apply balancing test of conduct of both prosecution and defendant, including length of delay, reason for delay, defendant's assertion of his right, and prejudice to defendant. Habeas corpus; sixth amendment.

Your Price: $10.00

Quantity

North Carolina v. Pearce

In imposing new sentence upon defendant whose original sentence has been set aside, trial judge may consider events subsequent to first trial and may impose sentence that is greater or less than original sentence.

Chavez v. Martinez

Qualified immunity does not apply to deprivation of constitutional rights; coercive police interrogation resulting in statements not used at trial violates Constitution only if interrogator's conduct shocks the conscience.

Oregon v. Elstad

Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine aplies to Fourth amendment, not Fifth Amendment; although Miranda requires the suppression of an un-warned admission, the admissibility of any subsequent statement turns on whether it was made voluntarily.

Voluntary Statements to Government Informant Admissable

Hoffa v. United States; Fourth Amendment protections from unreasonable searches and seizures extend to hotel rooms, but statements voluntarily made to informant are not inadmissible.

Police Searches Of Network Computers Require Warrant

United States v. Heckenkamp; absent clear warnings, connecting a personal computer to a computer network does not relinquish an otherwise objectively reasonable expectation of privacy; warrantless search.

Can Impeach with Inadmissable Evidence

Kansas v. Ventris; An informant's testimony, elicited in violation of the Sixth Amendment, is admissible to challenge the defendant's inconsistent testimony at trial; impeach.

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree

When a vehicle is stopped at a traffic stop, the passenger as well as the driver is seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment for search and seizure.

Search Warrant

Illinois v. McArthur; a person may be kept out of his home while the police obtain a search warrant.

Checkpoints

Illinois v. Lidster; traffic checkpoints may be part of a criminal investigation.

Minimum Sentence Enhancement

Harris v. United States; fact that increase a minimum sentence do not need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Presumption of Involuntariness

Maryland v. Shatzer; a break in custody ends the presumption of involuntariness established by Edwards v. Arizona.

Federal Habeas Standard

Harrington v. Richter; when the state court's decision is unaccompanied by explanation, the petitioner's burden must be met by showing there was no reasonable basis for the state court to deny relief.

Shopping Bag

Barker v. Wingo

Price

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons