Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Dickerson v. United States
Dickerson v. United States
Dickerson v. United States Cartoons

Dickerson v. United States

Congress may not legislatively supersede court decisions interpreting and applying the constitution. Prophylactic stare decisis.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Taylor v. Illinois
Taylor v. Illinois
The per se exclusion of evidence knowingly disclosed in violation of discovery rules does not violate the compulsory process clause. subpoena; offer of proof.
North Carolina v. Pearce
North Carolina v. Pearce
In imposing new sentence upon defendant whose original sentence has been set aside, trial judge may consider events subsequent to first trial and may impose sentence that is greater or less than original sentence.
Fong Foo v. United States
Fong Foo v. United States
A judgment of acquittal, even if based on error, is a final judgment that cannot be appealed. Writ of mandamus; double jeopardy.
Apprendi v. New Jersey
Apprendi v. New Jersey
Due process considerations of Fifth Amendment, applied to states through Fourteenth Amendment, requires an increase in maximum prison sentence to be based on facts found by jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Evidentiary hearing; hate crime.
Chavez v. Martinez
Chavez v. Martinez
Self-incrimination impossible when there is no trial; violation of right against self-incrimination occurs only when one is compelled to be a witness against himself in a criminal case.
Sentencing Judges May Consider Various Factors
Sentencing Judges May Consider Various Factors
Kimbrough v. United States; Under Booker, the cocaine Guidelines, like all other Sentencing Guidelines, are advisory only.
Right to Counsel
Right to Counsel
Texas v. Cobb; the Sixth Amendment right to counsel only attaches to the offense charged.
Minimum Sentence Enhancement
Minimum Sentence Enhancement
Harris v. United States; fact that increase a minimum sentence do not need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Reasonably Effective Assistance of Counsel
Reasonably Effective Assistance of Counsel
Harrington v. Richter; An unreasonable application of federal law is different from an incorrect application. State courts must be given some leeway. Strickland v. Washington. Strickland standard.
Fourth Amendment Search
Fourth Amendment Search
United States v. Jones; the definition of a Fourth Amendment "search" evolves with advances in technology. GPS. Karo. Katz.
Miranda Warnings
Miranda Warnings
Florida v. Powell; Although the four warnings Miranda requires are invariable, there are no specific words that must be used to adequately convey them.
Cheek Swab
Cheek Swab
Maryland v. King; taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the arrestee's DNA is, like fingerprinting and photographing, is a legitimate police booking procedure and is reasonable under the Four Amendment. DNA cheek swab.