Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Douglas v. California
Douglas v. California
Douglas v. California Cartoons

Douglas v. California

Indigent defendants are entitled to counsel for the first appeal as of right; ex parte; in forma pauperis.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Brown v. Ohio
Brown v. Ohio
Double jeopardy. a conviction of a lesser-included offense precludes a subsequent prosecution for the greater offense even though the two actions occurred several days apart.
Bartkus v. Illinois
Bartkus v. Illinois
Autrefois. successive federal and state prosecutions do not violate the fifth amendment s double jeopardy clause. Sovereignty.
Apprendi v. New Jersey
Apprendi v. New Jersey
Due process considerations of Fifth Amendment, applied to states through Fourteenth Amendment, requires an increase in maximum prison sentence to be based on facts found by jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Evidentiary hearing; hate crime.
Hector (A Slave) v. State
Hector (A Slave) v. State
Coerced confession offered under the influence of pain are inadmissible; torture; interrogation; court must decide whether a confession was voluntary.
Search of Vehicle Incident to Arrest
Search of Vehicle Incident to Arrest
Arizona v. Gant; Police may search vehicle incident to recent occupant's arrest only if arrestee is within reaching distance of passenger compartment at time search or reasonable to believe vehicle contains evidence offense of arrest; stare decisis.
School Search of Student Property
School Search of Student Property
Safford Unified School District #1 v. Redding; school search permissible if scope of measures adopted is reasonably related to objectives of search and not excessively intrusive; in loco parentis; qualified immunity.
Scope of Vehicle Search Incident to Arrest
Scope of Vehicle Search Incident to Arrest
Arizona v. Gant; Police may search vehicle incident to recent occupant's arrest only if arrestee is within reaching distance of passenger compartment at time of search and reasonable to believe vehicle contains evidence of offense of arrest.
Waiving Right to Counsel Post Indictment
Waiving Right to Counsel Post Indictment
Patterson v. Illinois; Whatever warnings suffice for Miranda's purposes will also be sufficient to safeguard the right to counsel in the context of post-indictment questioning; indict; sixth amendment.
Grand Jury
Grand Jury
United States v. Awadallah; a grand jury may issue an arrest warrant.
Trial Strategy
Trial Strategy
Wiggins v. Smith; trial strategy must be supported by reasonable investigation.
Reasonably Effective Assistance of Counsel
Reasonably Effective Assistance of Counsel
Harrington v. Richter; An unreasonable application of federal law is different from an incorrect application. State courts must be given some leeway. Strickland v. Washington. Strickland standard.
Curtilage
Curtilage
Florida v. Jardines; The curtilage of the house enjoys the same protection from unreasonable searches as the home itself; drug sniffing dogs are agents of the state for Fourth Amendment analysis.