Idaho v. Wright

Description
Customer Reviews

Trustworthiness of an out of court statement must be determined based on totality of circumstances that surrounded making of statement, without considering facts that may corroborate statement. Bootstrap.

Your Price: $10.00

Quantity

Cruz v. New York

Confessions of nontestifying co-defendants are inadmissible, even if they interlock with defendants own confession.

Jaffee v. Redmond

Evidentiary privileges are justified by an imperative need for confidence and trust in relationship, if that privilege also will serve public ends. Psychotherapist patient privelege.

People v. Gionis

The attorney client privilege applies only to statements made to attorney in his or her professional capacity, for purpose of seeking legal advice. Show cause order.

Commonwealth v. Stockhammer

When defendant requests access to privileged records, counsel for defendant should be allowed to examine records in order to determine what is necessary for defense.

Fisher v. United States

Client documents in possession of lawyer are protected by attorney client privilege only if Fifth Amendment privilege would have protected while in client's possession and documents given to lawyer for purpose of obtaining legal advice.

Best Evidence Rule for Chat Logs

United States v. Jackson; to prove the contents of a writing or recording, must introduce either the original or an accurate duplicate of the original.

Journalists Must Reveal Sources To Grand Juries

In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, Judith Miller; no First Amendment privilege that protects journalists from providing evidence to a grand jury.

Hearsay Within Hearsay Can Be Admissable

Sana v. Hawaiian Cruises, Ltd; For documents to be admissible, each layer of hearsay within them must satisfy an exception to the hearsay rule; business-records exception; Jones Act; maintenance and cure.

Forfeiture By Wrongdoing

Giles v. California; Forfeiture by wrongdoing applies only when defendant engaged or acquiesced in wrongdoing that was intended to, and did, procure unavailability of declarant as witness; domestic volence.

Common Knowledge May Be Considered By Fact Finders

U.S. v. Amado-Nunez; The whole range of human experience, from the rough meaning of common terms to human psychology, and which may properly enter into the fact-finder's decision-making process without the need for direct evidence.

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree

When a vehicle is stopped at a traffic stop, the passenger as well as the driver is seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment for search and seizure.

Late Filing

Williams v. District of Columbia; motion filed too late; timely filing required; missed deadline.

Shopping Bag

Idaho v. Wright

Price

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons