Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  Jackson v. Indiana
Jackson v. Indiana
Jackson v. Indiana Cartoons

Jackson v. Indiana

Fourteenth Amendment; pending criminal charges; insufficient basis for applying lesser procedural or substantive safeguards to prior civil commitment than otherwise afforded similarly situated persons. Civil commitment; incompetency; insanity.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Atkins v. Virginia
Atkins v. Virginia
Execution of mentally retarded person is unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment. deterence; retribution.
Commonwealth v. Fischer
Commonwealth v. Fischer
Reasonable mistake of fact regarding a victim's consent is not a defense to a rape charge. Mens rea.
Three Strikes
Three Strikes
James v. United States; Attempted burglary, as defined by Florida law, is a violent felony under ACCA Armed Career Criminal Act; three strikes.
Latimer v. The Queen
Latimer v. The Queen
Mercy killing is murder; for defense of necessity to apply, there must be an urgent situation of clear and imminent peril, no reasonable legal alternative to disobeying the law, and proportionality between the harm inflicted and the harm avoided.
Creative Accounting
Creative Accounting
White collar crime cartoon; Arthur Andersen LLP; withhold documents; alter documents; destroy documents.
Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller
Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller
Selective prosecution, courts are reluctant to interfere with prosecutorial discretion.
United States v. Armstrong
United States v. Armstrong
In selective-prosecution claims based on race, in order to obtain discovery, the claimant must produce preliminary evidence that similarly situated offenders of a different race could have been prosecuted but were not.
Ewing v. California
Ewing v. California
Three strikes law, Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment, deterrence, proportionality, recidivism, rehabilitation.
But-For-Cause of Injury
But-For-Cause of Injury
People v. Rideout; For a defendant's conduct to constitute the proximate cause of an injury, the victim's injury must be a direct and natural result of the defendant's actions; but-for-cause.
Accomplice Liability Requires Act, Not Mere Presence
Accomplice Liability Requires Act, Not Mere Presence
State v. V.T; Passive behavior, such as mere presence or even continuous presence, absent evidence that the defendant affirmatively did something to instigate, incite, embolden, or help others in committing a crime, is not accomplice liability.
Mental Illness Evidence Does Not Bear On Mens Rea
Mental Illness Evidence Does Not Bear On Mens Rea
Clark v. Arizona; The defendant appealed from his murder conviction, arguing that evidence of his mental illness should have been considered with regard to his ability to form the necessary mens rea.
Breach of Duty
Breach of Duty
Jones v. United States; must establish a duty before breach of duty can support a criminal conviction.