Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Kastigar v. United States
Kastigar v. United States
Kastigar v. United States Cartoons

Kastigar v. United States

The government may compel witness testimony under statutory immunity against the use of his testimony and all derivative evidence against him in a criminal case. Immunity transactional; immunity use.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Fong Foo v. United States
Fong Foo v. United States
A judgment of acquittal, even if based on error, is a final judgment that cannot be appealed. Writ of mandamus; double jeopardy.
Suspicionless Searches of Parolees
Suspicionless Searches of Parolees
Samson v. California; evidence seized in a suspicionless search of a parolee is admissible under the Fourth Amendment.
Police Searches Of Network Computers Require Warrant
Police Searches Of Network Computers Require Warrant
United States v. Heckenkamp; absent clear warnings, connecting a personal computer to a computer network does not relinquish an otherwise objectively reasonable expectation of privacy; warrantless search.
United States v. Resendiz-Ponce
United States v. Resendiz-Ponce
United States v. Resendiz-Ponce; indictments need not ordinarily plead specific conduct by the defendant to be constitutional.
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause and Taped Testimony
Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause and Taped Testimony
Crawford v. Washington; out-of-court statements are inadmissible into evidence if defendant has no opportunity to cross-examine speaker, unless witness is unavailable and defendant has prior opportunity to cross-examine the declarant; hearsay.
Totality of the Circumstances
Totality of the Circumstances
United States v. Arvizu; reasonable suspicion is based on the totality of the circumstances.
Search Warrant
Search Warrant
Illinois v. McArthur; a person may be kept out of his home while the police obtain a search warrant.
Jurisdictional Defect
Jurisdictional Defect
United States v. Cotton; failure to state the amount of drugs in an indictment is not a jurisdictional defect.
Minimum Sentence Enhancement
Minimum Sentence Enhancement
Harris v. United States; fact that increase a minimum sentence do not need to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Right to Counsel Class Action
Right to Counsel Class Action
Hurrell-Harring v. State of New York; class action permitted as state must provide legal representation to indigent criminal defendants at all critical stages of the proceedings against them.
Reject Plea Bargain
Reject Plea Bargain
Lafler v. Cooper; Ineffective assistance of counsel; malpractice; Strickland standard; Strickland prejudice; federal habeas relief; false promise; bad attorney; reject plea offer.
Selective Prosecution
Selective Prosecution
United States v. Armstrong; claim of selective prosecution based on race; claimant must produce evidence that similarly situated offenders of a different race could have been prosecuted but were not.