Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  People v. Staples
People v. Staples
People v. Staples Cartoons

People v. Staples

Actions in furtherance of crime are not mere preparation so long as they are substantial step toward commission of crime. Attempt; burglary.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Atkins v. Virginia
Atkins v. Virginia
Execution of mentally retarded person is unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment. deterence; retribution.
People v. Serravo
People v. Serravo
Applying statutory definition of insanity, right and wrong are measured by existing societal standards of morality rather defendant's personal and subjective understanding of illegality of act. Insane; insanity defense; not guilty by reason of insanity.
Rex v. Chisser
Rex v. Chisser
Taking goods without paying for them is treated as a felony even though the store clerk voluntarily handed the merchandise to the customer for inspection as part of an anticipated transaction. Felleo amimo incohate.
Three Strikes
Three Strikes
James v. United States; Attempted burglary, as defined by Florida law, is a violent felony under ACCA Armed Career Criminal Act; three strikes.
Hines v. State
Hines v. State
Felonies that create a foreseeable risk of death under the circumstances are inherently dangerous, justifying the felony-murder rule.
Evidence of Intoxication Is Admissable Sometimes
Evidence of Intoxication Is Admissable Sometimes
United States v. Veach; Intoxication, whether voluntary or involuntary, may preclude the formation of specific intent and thus serve to negate the mens rea element of specific-intent crimes; field sobriety test.
Accomplice Liability Requires Act, Not Mere Presence
Accomplice Liability Requires Act, Not Mere Presence
State v. V.T; Passive behavior, such as mere presence or even continuous presence, absent evidence that the defendant affirmatively did something to instigate, incite, embolden, or help others in committing a crime, is not accomplice liability.
Perjury By Implication Not Allowed
Perjury By Implication Not Allowed
Bronston v. United States; To support a perjury conviction, a witness must actually willfully state a material matter that he does not believe to be true.
Attorneys Are Officers Of the Court
Attorneys Are Officers Of the Court
United States v. Cueto; Otherwise lawful conduct violates 18 U.S.C. § 1503 if employed with corrupt intent to interfere, obstruct, or impede the due administration of justice.
Continuous Conspiracy
Continuous Conspiracy
Pinkerton v. United States; When there is a continuous conspiracy, and no evidence of affirmative action to establish withdrawal, as long as the partnership in crime continues, the partners act for each other.
Defense of Habitation
Defense of Habitation
State v. Boyett; entry to home not required for defense of habitation, but habitation defense not applicable if victim was fleeing.
Presumptive Sentence
Presumptive Sentence
United States v. Deegan; A sentence within the guidelines range is accorded a presumption of reasonableness.