Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Employment  >  Petty v. University of Delaware
Petty v. University of Delaware
Petty v. University of Delaware Cartoons

Petty v. University of Delaware

Available for work, qualified, willing, able, and ready to accept employment, no good cause to refuse.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Arres v. IMI Cornelius Remcor, Inc.
Arres v. IMI Cornelius Remcor, Inc.
An employee may not unilaterally disregard an employer directions despite a good faith belief.
Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District
Back v. Hastings on Hudson Union Free School District
Gender-stereotyping, establish discrimination on basis of sex.
BP, Inc. v. Alvarez
BP, Inc. v. Alvarez
Compensable time, activity integral and indispensable, Fair Labor Standards Act.
Campbell v. General Dynamics Government Systems Corporation
Campbell v. General Dynamics Government Systems Corporation
Mandatory arbitration policy, judicial forum, alternative dispute resolution, arbitration clause.
Jaime v. Director, Department of Emplyment Security
Jaime v. Director, Department of Emplyment Security
Employment conditions, voluntarily quit, attributable to employer, action or inaction of the employer.
Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller
Kentucky Association of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller
State statutes, relationship between insurers and health-care providers, ERISA, state laws, employment benefit plan, regulate insurance, banking, and securities.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
Employers non-discriminatory justifications for actions, Title VII case, unlawful discrimination, pretext.
Perry v. State
Perry v. State
Workers compensation, benefits not paid for injuries caused by knowing rule violations, explicit employment policy, course of employment.
Russell v. Board of County Commissioners
Russell v. Board of County Commissioners
Employee handbook forms an implied employment contract, disclimer, implied-in-fact, implied-in-law.
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams
Qualify as disabled under the ADA, physical impairment, mental impairment, substantially limits a major life activity, Americans with Disabilities Act.
Varity Corporation v. Howe
Varity Corporation v. Howe
Intentional representations, future of plan benefits, act of plan administration giving rise to a fiduciary duty, fiduciary receiver.
Employers May Monitor Messages Received By Employees On The Job
Employers May Monitor Messages Received By Employees On The Job
City of Ontario v. Quon; Even when employee has reasonable expectation of privacy in workplace, government employer does not violate Fourth Amendment when it invades the employee's privacy for a legitimate work-related reason.