Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Ethics and Professsionalism  >  Representations By Opposing Counsel
Representations By Opposing Counsel
Representations By Opposing Counsel Cartoons

Representations By Opposing Counsel

Fire Ins. Exchange v. Bell. Parties have a right to rely on the representations of opposing counsel as a matter of law.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States
Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States
Affirmative fraud, rule 10-b5 violation, failure to disclose, causation, concealment, misrepresentation, reliance.
Underwriter Duty to Investors
Underwriter Duty to Investors
Dolphin and Bradbury, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission; Because investors rely on the reputation, integrity, independence, and expertise of an underwriter, the underwriter has a obligation to investigate and disclose material facts.
Client Responsible For Actions of Attorney
Client Responsible For Actions of Attorney
S.E.C. v. McNulty; Ordinarily, the conduct of an attorney is imputed to his client, since allowing a party to evade the consequences of the acts or omissions of his freely selected agent would be inconsistent with system of representative litigation.
Liquidated Damages May Be In Attorney Client Agreement
Liquidated Damages May Be In Attorney Client Agreement
McQueen, Rains & Tresch LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp; Non-refundable retainer fees and other non-refundable provisions in attorney fee agreements will be upheld if reasonable; sophisticated client; contract is in writing; incurred expenses.
Denial of Fair Trial Due to Unfair Publicity
Denial of Fair Trial Due to Unfair Publicity
Jovanovic v. City of New York; To prevail on a claim for denial of a fair trial due to prejudicial publicity, the plaintiff must establish (1) improper leaks; (2) in fact denied a fair trial; and (3) other remedies were not available or used to no avail.
Government Regulation of Candidate Speech
Government Regulation of Candidate Speech
Republican Party of Minnesota v. White; Government regulations suppress speech on basis of content must narrowly tailored to serve compelling state interest; first amendment.
Attorney Ethics Rules Reflect Public Policy
Attorney Ethics Rules Reflect Public Policy
Crews v. Buckman Labs. Int'l, Inc. In-house counsel may bring a common-law action for retaliatory discharge resulting compliance with Code of Professional Responsibility provision that represents a clear and definitive statement of public policy.
Simultaneous Representation of Adverse Interests
Simultaneous Representation of Adverse Interests
The Florida Bar v. Belleville An attorney has an ethical obligation to ensure that his client does not take unfair advantage of an unrepresented adversary.
Legal Malpractice Claims
Legal Malpractice Claims
Viner v. Sweet; plaintiff in a transactional malpractice action must show that but for the alleged malpractice, it is more likely than not that plaintiff would have obtained a more favorable result; but-for causation.
Attorney Neglect
Attorney Neglect
Bakery Machinery & Fabrication, Inc. v. Traditional Baking, Inc.; clients are the principals, the attorney is an agent; under law of agency, principal is bound by agent's deeds, except attorney misconduct outside the scope of employment.
Attorney Client Solicitation
Attorney Client Solicitation
In re Primus; when freedom of association is involved, the state must demonstrate a compelling subordinating interest, and that the means employed is closely drawn to avoid unnecessary abridgement of associational freedoms.
Deceptive Investigation
Deceptive Investigation
United States v. Carona; the government may use deception in its investigations in order to induce suspects into making incriminating statements, even if reprensented by an attorney. California Rule 2-100.