Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Spinelli v. United States
Spinelli v. United States
Spinelli v. United States Cartoons

Spinelli v. United States

Probable cause; informant must have reliable knowledge of the subject matter of his tip in order for a search warrant based on the tip to be valid.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Mistretta v. United States
Mistretta v. United States
Sentencing guidelines are constitutional, amounting to neither an excessive delegation of legislative power nor a violation of the separation of powers principle. Indeterminate sentence.
United States v. Harrington
United States v. Harrington
Sentencing guidelines often produce harsh results that are patently unfair because they fail to take into account individual circumstances.
Blockburger v. United States
Blockburger v. United States
Continuing offense; separate and distinct offenses, even if of the same nature, do not constitute a continuing offense, such as two sales of narcotics to the same purchaser, but at different times. The narcotics act penalizes each individual sale.
Harris v. Oklahoma
Harris v. Oklahoma
When the conviction of a greater crime cannot be had without conviction of a lesser crime, the double jeopardy clause bars prosecution for the lesser crime after conviction for the greater crime.
Smith v. Texas
Smith v. Texas
See also similar holdings in Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman and Brewer v. Quarterman.
Entrapment Defense
Entrapment Defense
Sherman v. United States; repeated requests to commit a crime and pleas for sympathy establish entrapment; if defendant's criminal conduct arises from the inducement of law enforcement officers, not the intention of the defendant.
Employer Listening to Private Employee Telephone Conversations
Employer Listening to Private Employee Telephone Conversations
Deal v. Spears; Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1996 creates exception to civil liability for aural interception during business use of a telephone extension; scope of exception limited to the business purpose.
Totality of the Circumstances
Totality of the Circumstances
United States v. Arvizu; reasonable suspicion is based on the totality of the circumstances.
Age as Miranda Custody Factor
Age as Miranda Custody Factor
J.D.B. v. North Carolina; A child's age properly informs the Miranda custody analysis because children may not feel free to terminate interrogation.
Presumption of Involuntariness
Presumption of Involuntariness
Maryland v. Shatzer; a break in custody ends the presumption of involuntariness established by Edwards v. Arizona.
Exclusionary Rule
Exclusionary Rule
Davis v. United States; deterrent effect of exclusionary rule; deter Fourth Amendment violations by police and law enforcement; Arizona v. Gant.
Communicate Plea Bargain
Communicate Plea Bargain
Missouri v. Frye; ineffective assistance of counsel; communicate plea offer; Strickland standard; Strickland prejudice.