State v. Kinney

Description
Customer Reviews

Trial courts may admit expert testimony if reliability of evidence equals that of other technical evidence held to be admissible and evaluation of other courts allowing admission of evidence is complete and persuasive. Judicial notice; plain error.

Your Price: $10.00

Quantity

Dallas County v. Commercial Union Assurance Company

Ancient document. Hearsay evidence may be admissible if there is no other way of proving facts in hearsay statement and if there are circumstances that show evidence is trustworthy enough without need for cross examination.

Idaho v. Wright

Trustworthiness of an out of court statement must be determined based on totality of circumstances that surrounded making of statement, without considering facts that may corroborate statement. Bootstrap.

United States v. Scheffer

Compulsory Process Clause does not guarantee right to present polygraph evidence.

Kumho Tire Company v. Carmichael

All expert testimony must be evaluated to determine if it has connection to relevant inquiry and reliable basis in knowledge and experience of relevant discipline.

Seiler v. Lucasfilm

Best evidence rule. When contents of written document or equivalent are at issue, contents must be proved by original document unless original is unavailable for some reason that is not fault of proponent. Infringement.

Blackmon v. State

Attorney client privilege. In order for statement to attorney to be confidential, client must reasonably intend that communication be confidential.

In Re Lindsey

Attorney client privilege does not prevent government lawyers from testifying about possible commission of crimes by other government officials.

Demonstrative Evidence

Commonwealth v. Serge; computer-generated animation is admissible if fair and accurate representation of evidence, relevant under the rules of evidence, and its probative value is not outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice; undue prejudice.

Out of Court Statements to Police Officer

Davis v. Washington Hammon v. Indiana; admissibility depends on whether testimonial; statements to police are non-testimonial if primary purpose of the interrogation is to enable the police to meet an ongoing emergency.

DNA Evidence

Brown v. Farwell; A federal court considering a habeas corpus petition may exclude evidence admitted in the state court if the evidence rendered the trial so fundamentally unfair as to violate federal due process; reasonable doubt.

Dying Declaration

R. v. Perry; dying declaration hearsay exception requires expectation that death is imminent.

Inadmissable Dying Declaration

State v. Williams; Expression of opinion is inadmissable hearsay even if declarant thought death was imminent; hearsay rule.

Shopping Bag

State v. Kinney

Price

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons