State v. Rocker

Description
Customer Reviews

Indecent exposure can be established by an inference of the defendant's general intent to be seen by the public.

Your Price: $10.00

Quantity

State v. Leidholm

battered-woman syndrome. In claim of self-defense, defendant conduct is evaluated according to what she in good faith honestly believed and had reasonable ground believe necessary protect defendant from death or great bodily injury.

State v. Hunter

Compulsion is not a defense to homicide charge unless charge is felony murder. Felony murder rule.

State v. Verive

Conviction for conspiracy requires an agreement to commit a criminal act and some overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. Corroboration; double jeopardy clause; immunity; perjury.

Boro v. People

Consent to an act of sexual intercourse will bar prosecution for rape, even when consent was obtained by fraud, if victim knew that she was consenting to an act of sexual intercourse. Fraud in the factum; fraud in the inducement; prohibition.

People v. Wilhelm

Rape shield; evidence of victim's sexual conduct with a third party is irrelevant to the issue of whether she consented to sexual intercourse with the defendant; public, provocative displays may or may not be admissible in rape trials.

Clark v. Arizona

Mens rae, under Arizona's Mott rule, a court will not allow evidence of a mental disorder short of insanity as bearing on a defendant's capacity to form specific intent.

Involutarily Commit Sexual Predators

Kansas v. Hendricks; Where a civil commitment statute does not seek retribution or deterrence, it does not establish punitive criminal proceedings necessary to uphold double jeopardy and ex post facto claims.

Honest Services Fraud

United States v. Rybicki; To establish honest services fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1346, the evidence must show (1) a scheme or artifice to defraud; (2) for depriving another ofhonest services...; bribery; conflict of interest; kickback; self-dealing behavior.

Perjury By Implication Not Allowed

Bronston v. United States; To support a perjury conviction, a witness must actually willfully state a material matter that he does not believe to be true.

Mental Illness Evidence Does Not Bear On Mens Rea

Clark v. Arizona; The defendant appealed from his murder conviction, arguing that evidence of his mental illness should have been considered with regard to his ability to form the necessary mens rea.

Taylor Overruled

People v. Superior Court; doctrine of "nonmutual collateral estoppe" should not be applied in criminal cases.

Honest Services Fraud Doctrine

Skilling v. United States; bribery and kickbacks are honest services fraud, but conflict of interest is not.

Shopping Bag

State v. Rocker

Price

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons