Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.

Description
Customer Reviews

Discrimination complaints,.state a prima facie case, evidentiary standard for trial, not a rule of pleading.

Your Price: $10.00

Quantity

M.K. v. Tenet

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 18 provides for unrestricted joinder of claims against an opposing party, severence.

M.K. v. Tenet

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a) permits joinder of plaintiffs if all claims arose out of the same transaction or occurrence and share common questions of law or fact, permissive joinder.

Wilson v. Olathe Bank

Movants, protective order, federal rule of civil procedure 30(b)(2), record a deposition by nonstenographic means and is given the choice of the method of recording, absent annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, and undue burden or expense.

Battle v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport

Deposition testimony of an unavailable witness may be introduced at trial, continuance, unavailability.

Harmless Error Admitting Hearsay Evidence

Harnden v. Jayco, Inc.; summary judgment testimony usually form of an affidavit or sworn statement even if a court's consideration of inadmissible evidence is in error, such error is harmless it if does not affect any party's substantial rights.

Federal Question Jurisdiction

Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing; federal forum for federal tax litigation sufficiently substantial for exercise of federal question jurisdiction; federal title law; division of labor between state and federal courts.

Federal Question Jurisdiction

Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing; The national interest in providing a federal forum for federal tax litigation is sufficiently substantial to support the exercise of federal question jurisdiction.

Courts May Use Non-Court Personnel

In re Peterson; The Seventh Amendment does not prohibit the introduction of new methods for determining what facts are in issue, nor new rules of evidence.

Rule Against Nonparty Preclusion Exceptions

Taylor v. Sturgell; The rule against nonparty preclusion is subject only to certain recognized exceptions: (1) a nonparty may agree to be bound by a judgment, (2) certain substantive relationships..; virtual representation; virtual representation doctrine.

Attorney Filing Frivolous Case Is Subject To Monetary Sanctions

Chaplin v. Du Pont Advance Fiber Sys; Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, a complaint must not be presented for an improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or cost of litigation; contain claims warranted by existing law.

The Hague Convention or FRCP

Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court; Hague Convention is not exclusive means for obtaining evidence located abroad; comity; mandamus.

Gender Discrimination Class Action

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes; Walmart sex discrimination; class actions require a common claim that can be resolved with one determination.

Shopping Bag

Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.

Price

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons