Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  Telephone Call As Admissable Evidence
Telephone Call As Admissable Evidence
Telephone Call As Admissable Evidence Cartoons

Telephone Call As Admissable Evidence

State v. Small; a voice over the telephone may be identified as being that of a particular person if there is evidence that shows the person identified is the only one who could have uttered the speech under the circumstances.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

United States v. Laster
United States v. Laster
Residuary hearsay exception allows admission of hearsay if there is no indication that evidence is not reliable, if hearsay is more probative on point for which it is offered than any other evidence, and if its admission serves best interests of justice.
Cruz v. New York
Cruz v. New York
Confessions of nontestifying co-defendants are inadmissible, even if they interlock with defendants own confession.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Expert testimony must reflect scientific knowledge must be relevant to proposing party's case. Daubert test.
United States v. Stelmokas
United States v. Stelmokas
Authentication. Requirement that document be authenticated before it may be admitted into evidence is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support finding that document is what its proponent claims it to be. Chain of custody.
United States v. Rakes
United States v. Rakes
privilege for marital communications permits individual to refuse to testify, and to prevent spouse or former spouse from testifying, regarding any confidential communication made by individual to spouse during the of marriage. Extortion misprison.
Defendant May Introduce Evidence of Third Party's Guilt
Defendant May Introduce Evidence of Third Party's Guilt
Holmes v. South Carolina; Rules of evidence in criminal trials may not be arbitrary, must be focused on the central issues in the case, and must be applied to afford the defendant a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.
Affidavits That Support Search Warrants
Affidavits That Support Search Warrants
U.S. v. Tzannos; There is a presumption of validity with respect to affidavits supporting search warrants; ex parte; franks hearing; in camera.
Common Knowledge May Be Considered By Fact Finders
Common Knowledge May Be Considered By Fact Finders
U.S. v. Amado-Nunez; The whole range of human experience, from the rough meaning of common terms to human psychology, and which may properly enter into the fact-finder's decision-making process without the need for direct evidence.
Excited Utterance Exception to Hearsay
Excited Utterance Exception to Hearsay
United States v. Arnold; May admit an out-of-court statement for truth of the matter asserted if the statement relates to a startling event or condition and was made while declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.
Emergency Statements
Emergency Statements
People v. Sergio; Tarasoff exception; statement to the EMT ambulance drivers were not doctor patient privilege; physician patient privilege.
Innocence Project
Innocence Project
Peterson v. Bernardi; DNA evidence; testing evidence to prove innocence of convicted prisoner.
Lab Report Admissable Evidence
Lab Report Admissable Evidence
Williams v. Illinois; Confrontation Clause; admission of DNA evidence; laboratory report; forensics report; DNA match; sexual assualt medical evidence.