Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Contracts  >  The statute of frauds
The statute of frauds
The statute of frauds Cartoons

The statute of frauds

Cloud Corp. v. Hasbro, Inc.; the statute of frauds does not require that a contract itself be in writing, only that there is adequate documentary evidence of its existence and its essential terms.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Mere Puffery
Mere Puffery
In re Toshiba America HD DVD Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation; express warranty is not created by mere puffery; a statement about future performance may create express warranty if it is an affirmation or representation. performance.
Statute of Frauds Exception
Statute of Frauds Exception
Kolkman v. Roth; an exception to the statute of frauds applies in cases of promissory estoppel.
Oral Promise Unenforceable
Oral Promise Unenforceable
Marmer v. Kaufman; Oral promises are unenforceable for lack of consideration where the promisor receives no benefit by enforcement of the promise and the promisee suffers no legal detriment.
Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel
Doctrine of Promissory Estoppel
Stewart v. Cendant Mobility Services Corp.; a promise that the promisor should reasonably expect to induce action or forbearance and does is binding if injustice can be avoided only by enforcement of the promise.
Mutual Mistake
Mutual Mistake
Tracy v. Morell; even when there is no fraud, there may be mutual mistake; where both parties share a common false assumption about a vital fact upon which their bargain is based, the transaction may be avoided.
Material Alteration of Contract
Material Alteration of Contract
Bayway Refining Co. v. Oxygenated Marketing & Trading A.G.; the burden of proving that additional terms would be a material alteration of the contractual obligation is on the party who objects; surprised party.
Adequate Assurances
Adequate Assurances
By-Lo Oil Co. v. ParTech, Inc.; The mere fact that performance is to become due is not reasonable grounds for insecurity. Between merchants, the reasonableness of the grounds will be determined by commercial standards.
Infancy Doctrine
Infancy Doctrine
Douglass v. Pflueger Hawaii, Inc.; the general rule that contracts entered into by minors are voidable does not apply in the employment context.
Forebearance as Consideration
Forebearance as Consideration
Dyer v. National By-Products, Inc.; Forbearance to assert a claim or defense that proves to be invalid is consideration if the forbearing party believes that the claim or defense may fairly be determined to be valid.
Mailbox Rule
Mailbox Rule
United States Life Insurance Company v. Wilson; the common-law rule providing that acceptance of an offer is effective when it is sent will apply to electronic transactions that resemble traditional paper transactions.
Windfall Damages
Windfall Damages
H-W-H Cattle Co., Inc. v. Schroeder; Under the Uniform Commercial Code, a buyer has two options when the seller fails to deliver: (1) the buyer may "cover" by making a good faith substitute purchase; or (2) recover damages for non-delivery.
Promise to Impregnate
Promise to Impregnate
Perry v. Atkinson; there is no cause of action for the fraudulent breach of a promise to impregnate. Certain sexual conduct and interpersonal decisions are, on public policy grounds, outside the realm of tort liability.