Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  Tuer v. McDonald
Tuer v. McDonald
Tuer v. McDonald Cartoons

Tuer v. McDonald

Evidence of remedial measures taken after allegedly negligent act is not admissible to prove negligence; impeachment motion in limine.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

United States v. Laster
United States v. Laster
Residuary hearsay exception allows admission of hearsay if there is no indication that evidence is not reliable, if hearsay is more probative on point for which it is offered than any other evidence, and if its admission serves best interests of justice.
Cruz v. New York
Cruz v. New York
Confessions of nontestifying co-defendants are inadmissible, even if they interlock with defendants own confession.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Expert testimony must reflect scientific knowledge must be relevant to proposing party's case. Daubert test.
United States v. Stelmokas
United States v. Stelmokas
Authentication. Requirement that document be authenticated before it may be admitted into evidence is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support finding that document is what its proponent claims it to be. Chain of custody.
United States v. Rakes
United States v. Rakes
privilege for marital communications permits individual to refuse to testify, and to prevent spouse or former spouse from testifying, regarding any confidential communication made by individual to spouse during the of marriage. Extortion misprison.
Near Miss Doctrine for Hearsay Evidence
Near Miss Doctrine for Hearsay Evidence
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd; The residual hearsay exceptions should be used very rarely, and only in exceptional and unanticipated circumstances that are not specifically covered by particular exceptions.
Forfeiture By Wrongdoing
Forfeiture By Wrongdoing
Giles v. California; Forfeiture by wrongdoing applies only when defendant engaged or acquiesced in wrongdoing that was intended to, and did, procure unavailability of declarant as witness; domestic volence.
Judicial Notice of Fact
Judicial Notice of Fact
Fielding v. State; When a court takes judicial notice of a fact in a criminal case, the court must instruct the jury that it may, but is not required to, accept as conclusive any fact so judicially noticed; directed verdict; harmless error; jury instruction.
DNA Evidence
DNA Evidence
Brown v. Farwell; A federal court considering a habeas corpus petition may exclude evidence admitted in the state court if the evidence rendered the trial so fundamentally unfair as to violate federal due process; reasonable doubt.
Clergy Privilege
Clergy Privilege
In re Grand Jury Investigation; confessional; confessor; clergy communicant privilege; confidential relationship; priest; minister; clergyman.
Emergency Statements
Emergency Statements
People v. Sergio; Tarasoff exception; statement to the EMT ambulance drivers were not doctor patient privilege; physician patient privilege.
Lab Report Admissable Evidence
Lab Report Admissable Evidence
Williams v. Illinois; Confrontation Clause; admission of DNA evidence; laboratory report; forensics report; DNA match; sexual assualt medical evidence.