Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  United States v. Barrett
United States v. Barrett
United States v. Barrett Cartoons

United States v. Barrett

Prior inconsistent statements of witness are admissible to impeach the credibility of that witness.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Lilly v. Virginia
Lilly v. Virginia
A hearsay exception is regarded as firmly rooted if, in light of longstanding legislative and judicial experience, the admission of virtually any evidence under that exception comports with substance of Confrontation Clause.
In Re Melton
In Re Melton
Expert opinions may be based on hearsay that meets minimum standards of reliability. Civil commitment.
Kumho Tire Company v. Carmichael
Kumho Tire Company v. Carmichael
All expert testimony must be evaluated to determine if it has connection to relevant inquiry and reliable basis in knowledge and experience of relevant discipline.
United States v. Hubbell
United States v. Hubbell
Fifth Amendment privilege against self incrimination protects witness from being compelled to answer questions about existence of sources of potentially incriminating evidence and from subpoena seeking discovery. Transactional immunity.
Silence May or May Not Be Admissable Testimony
Silence May or May Not Be Admissable Testimony
Wilson v. Clancy; Under Fed R. Civ. P. 56(c), in order to create a triable issue of fact, affidavits must contain evidence that would be admissible at trial; affidavit; inference; joint tenancy; right of survivorship; summary judgment.
Near Miss Doctrine for Hearsay Evidence
Near Miss Doctrine for Hearsay Evidence
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd; The residual hearsay exceptions should be used very rarely, and only in exceptional and unanticipated circumstances that are not specifically covered by particular exceptions.
Hypnotism Not Allowed To Refresh Memory
Hypnotism Not Allowed To Refresh Memory
State v. Moore; The hypnotically refreshed testimony of a witness in a criminal trial is generally inadmissible.
Common Knowledge May Be Considered By Fact Finders
Common Knowledge May Be Considered By Fact Finders
U.S. v. Amado-Nunez; The whole range of human experience, from the rough meaning of common terms to human psychology, and which may properly enter into the fact-finder's decision-making process without the need for direct evidence.
Late Filing
Late Filing
Williams v. District of Columbia; motion filed too late; timely filing required; missed deadline.
Admissability of Suicide Note
Admissability of Suicide Note
Garza v. Delta Tau Delta Fraternity National; dying declaration; hearsay rule; statement made by the declarant while believing her death was imminent.
Best Evidence Rule Computer Records
Best Evidence Rule Computer Records
United States v. Diaz-Lopez; best evidence rule does not apply to testimony that records have been examined and found not to contain any reference to a designated matter.
Doctor Patient Privilege
Doctor Patient Privilege
United States v. Tome; physician patient privilege; statement to physician; hearsay rule; information required for diagnosis or treatment; Fed. R. Evid. 803(4).