Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  United States v. Hubbell
United States v. Hubbell
United States v. Hubbell Cartoons

United States v. Hubbell

The privilege against self incrimination protects against being compelled to provide information to a grand jury about the existence of sources of potentially incriminating evidence. Independent counsel; subpoena duces tecum; ad testificandum.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Fong Foo v. United States
Fong Foo v. United States
A judgment of acquittal, even if based on error, is a final judgment that cannot be appealed. Writ of mandamus; double jeopardy.
Downum v. United States
Downum v. United States
If an impaneled jury is discharged because the prosecution witness is unavailable, double jeopardy applies to bar the impaneling of a second jury and a new trial. Impanel.
Teague v. Lane
Teague v. Lane
Procedural rules usually do not apply retroactively. new constitutional rules of criminal procedure will not be applicable to those cases that have become final before the new rules are announced. Ratio decidendi.
Wainwright v. Sykes
Wainwright v. Sykes
Contemporaneous objection rule. absent a showing of cause and prejudice attendant to a state procedural waiver, a federal habeas corpus review of a waived objection to the admission of a confession at trial is barred. Coram nobis.
Chavez v. Martinez
Chavez v. Martinez
Self-incrimination impossible when there is no trial; violation of right against self-incrimination occurs only when one is compelled to be a witness against himself in a criminal case.
Employer Listening to Private Employee Telephone Conversations
Employer Listening to Private Employee Telephone Conversations
Deal v. Spears; Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1996 creates exception to civil liability for aural interception during business use of a telephone extension; scope of exception limited to the business purpose.
Search of Vehicle Incident to Arrest
Search of Vehicle Incident to Arrest
Arizona v. Gant; Police may search vehicle incident to recent occupant's arrest only if arrestee is within reaching distance of passenger compartment at time search or reasonable to believe vehicle contains evidence offense of arrest; stare decisis.
Checkpoints
Checkpoints
Illinois v. Lidster; traffic checkpoints may be part of a criminal investigation.
Pretrial Publicity
Pretrial Publicity
Skilling v. United States; For purposes of obtaining a fair trial, it is sufficient if the jurors can lay aside their impressions or opinions and render a verdict based on the evidence presented in court.
Federal Habeas Standard
Federal Habeas Standard
Harrington v. Richter; when the state court's decision is unaccompanied by explanation, the petitioner's burden must be met by showing there was no reasonable basis for the state court to deny relief.
Duty to Disclose Material Evidence
Duty to Disclose Material Evidence
Smith v. Cain; Brady Rule; the prosecutor violates right to due process if it withholds evidence that is favorable to the defense and material to guilt or punishment.
Selective Prosecution
Selective Prosecution
United States v. Armstrong; claim of selective prosecution based on race; claimant must produce evidence that similarly situated offenders of a different race could have been prosecuted but were not.