Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  United States v. Scheffer
United States v. Scheffer
United States v. Scheffer Cartoons

United States v. Scheffer

Compulsory Process Clause does not guarantee right to present polygraph evidence.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

United States v. Crumby
United States v. Crumby
Polygraph evidence will be admitted for limited purpose of impeaching or corroborating credibility of defendant who testifies.
State v. Kinney
State v. Kinney
Trial courts may admit expert testimony if reliability of evidence equals that of other technical evidence held to be admissible and evaluation of other courts allowing admission of evidence is complete and persuasive. Judicial notice; plain error.
Seiler v. Lucasfilm
Seiler v. Lucasfilm
Best evidence rule. When contents of written document or equivalent are at issue, contents must be proved by original document unless original is unavailable for some reason that is not fault of proponent. Infringement.
People v. Gionis
People v. Gionis
The attorney client privilege applies only to statements made to attorney in his or her professional capacity, for purpose of seeking legal advice. Show cause order.
Prior Bad Acts Are Relevant Evidence
Prior Bad Acts Are Relevant Evidence
United States v. DeGeorge; inextricably intertwined with a charged offense; may be admitted if constitutes a part of the transaction that serves as basis for criminal charge, or for coherent and comprehensive story regarding commission of crime.
Character Evidence
Character Evidence
United States v. Whitmore; Rule 608(a); party may introduce reputation or opinion evidence of a witness's character for truthfulness only if character witness is acquainted with witness, his community, and circles in which he has moved.
Best Evidence Rule for Chat Logs
Best Evidence Rule for Chat Logs
United States v. Jackson; to prove the contents of a writing or recording, must introduce either the original or an accurate duplicate of the original.
Attorney-Client Privilege Inadvertent Waiver
Attorney-Client Privilege Inadvertent Waiver
Koch Foods of Alabama, LLC v. General Electric Capital Corp.; totality of the circumstances balancing test determines whether client confidentiality waived.
Defendant May Introduce Evidence of Third Party's Guilt
Defendant May Introduce Evidence of Third Party's Guilt
Holmes v. South Carolina; Rules of evidence in criminal trials may not be arbitrary, must be focused on the central issues in the case, and must be applied to afford the defendant a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.
Confrontation Clause
Confrontation Clause
People v. Moreno; defendant forfeits his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation if he wrongfully keeps a witness from testifying at trial, but it must be proven defendant's actions were intended to make witness unavailable; confrontation clause.
An Affiant Is a Witness
An Affiant Is a Witness
Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts; an affidavit is a witness for Sixth Amendment, so can be confronted at trial unless (1) unavailable to testify and (2) adverse party had a prior opportunity to cross examine the maker.
Lab Report Admissable Evidence
Lab Report Admissable Evidence
Williams v. Illinois; Confrontation Clause; admission of DNA evidence; laboratory report; forensics report; DNA match; sexual assualt medical evidence.