Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  United States v. Stevens
United States v. Stevens
United States v. Stevens Cartoons

United States v. Stevens

Evidence that defendant did not commit similar crimes may be used to show that defendant did not commit the crime charged. Harmless error.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

United States v. Laster
United States v. Laster
Residuary hearsay exception allows admission of hearsay if there is no indication that evidence is not reliable, if hearsay is more probative on point for which it is offered than any other evidence, and if its admission serves best interests of justice.
Mattox v. United States
Mattox v. United States
Defendant rights under confrontation clause are satisfied if defendant has once had opportunity to see a witness face to face and subject that witness to cross examination. Confrontation clause.
Cruz v. New York
Cruz v. New York
Confessions of nontestifying co-defendants are inadmissible, even if they interlock with defendants own confession.
United States v. Figueroa-Lopez
United States v. Figueroa-Lopez
Witness may not give opinion testimony about matters outside the realm of common knowledge unless that witness is qualified as an expert. Expert witness.
Wagner v. State
Wagner v. State
Silent witness theory. Pictorial evidence is admissible if there is an adequate foundation attesting to accuracy of process that produced image.
Jaffee v. Redmond
Jaffee v. Redmond
Evidentiary privileges are justified by an imperative need for confidence and trust in relationship, if that privilege also will serve public ends. Psychotherapist patient privelege.
Swidler and Berlin v. United States
Swidler and Berlin v. United States
Attorney client privilege survives death of client. Independent counsel.
Fisher v. United States
Fisher v. United States
Client documents in possession of lawyer are protected by attorney client privilege only if Fifth Amendment privilege would have protected while in client's possession and documents given to lawyer for purpose of obtaining legal advice.
United States v. Rakes
United States v. Rakes
privilege for marital communications permits individual to refuse to testify, and to prevent spouse or former spouse from testifying, regarding any confidential communication made by individual to spouse during the of marriage. Extortion misprison.
Specialized Knowledge is Basis for Expert Testimony
Specialized Knowledge is Basis for Expert Testimony
United States v. Ganier; computer software experience provides expert, not lay, testimony.
Attorney-Client Privilege Inadvertent Waiver
Attorney-Client Privilege Inadvertent Waiver
Koch Foods of Alabama, LLC v. General Electric Capital Corp.; totality of the circumstances balancing test determines whether client confidentiality waived.
Authentication and Foundation
Authentication and Foundation
Turnage v. State; A duplicate document or recording is admissible to the same extent as the original unless a genuine question is raised about the authenticity of the duplicate or it would be unfair to admit.