Zurcher v. Stanford Daily

Description
Customer Reviews

Freedom of the press; the press is not immune from a valid search warrant; a warrant may issue to search any property, regardless of whether the occupant is suspected of a crime.

Your Price: $10.00

Quantity

United States v. Burr

The sixth amendment right to compel witnesses includes the right to compel production of documents within the witness' possession. Subpoena duces tecum.

McMillan v. Pennsylvania

Right to a jury trial is not violated by pennsylvania mandatory minimum sentencing act. may impose minimum upon finding, by a preponderance of the evidence, of certain facts. Defendant possessed a firearm during enumerated offense.

Apprendi v. New Jersey

Due process considerations of Fifth Amendment, applied to states through Fourteenth Amendment, requires an increase in maximum prison sentence to be based on facts found by jury beyond a reasonable doubt. Evidentiary hearing; hate crime.

Smith v. Texas

See also similar holdings in Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman and Brewer v. Quarterman.

Hoffman v. United States

Fifth Amendment applies to grand jury testimony; privilege against self-incrimination may be invoked if there is a possibility that the answers sought would have a tendency to incriminate the witness.

Suspicionless Searches of Parolees

Samson v. California; evidence seized in a suspicionless search of a parolee is admissible under the Fourth Amendment.

Federal Wiretapping Laws

United States v. Turk; replaying of legally recorded conversations does not constitute an illegal aural interception; aural acquisition.

Issue Preclusion Analysis for Double Jeapardy

Yeager v. United States; Although acquittals may preclude retrial on counts on which the same jury hangs, the consideration of hung counts has no place in the issue preclusion analysis for double jeopardy purposes; hung jury.

Can Impeach with Inadmissable Evidence

Kansas v. Ventris; An informant's testimony, elicited in violation of the Sixth Amendment, is admissible to challenge the defendant's inconsistent testimony at trial; impeach.

Attachment of Right To Counsel

Rothgery v. Gillespie County. A criminal defendant's initial appearance before a judicial officer triggers the attachment of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Brewer v. Williams and Michigan v. Jackson.

Miranda Warnings

Florida v. Powell; Although the four warnings Miranda requires are invariable, there are no specific words that must be used to adequately convey them.

Cheek Swab

Maryland v. King; taking and analyzing a cheek swab of the arrestee's DNA is, like fingerprinting and photographing, is a legitimate police booking procedure and is reasonable under the Four Amendment. DNA cheek swab.

Shopping Bag

Zurcher v. Stanford Daily

Price

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons