Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  Bailey v. United States
Bailey v. United States
Bailey v. United States Cartoons

Bailey v. United States

In order to be guilty of aiding and abetting another with the commission of a crime, the defendant must have voluntarily associated himself with the endeavor. Directed verdict; perpetrator.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

United States v. Diaz
United States v. Diaz
Participant in a conspiracy is criminally liable for all acts that are done by other members in furtherance of the conspiracy and that are reasonably foreseeable as a necessary consequence of the unlawful agreement.
State v. Christy Pontiac-GMC, Inc.
State v. Christy Pontiac-GMC, Inc.
Corporation may be convicted of specific-intent crime when agent of corporation takes illegal acts in furtherance of the corporate business interests; alter ego; commercial crime; corporate crime; legal fiction; specific intent; swindle.
In the Interest of M.T.S.
In the Interest of M.T.S.
Sexual assault consists of any act of sexual penetration done without the affirmative and freely given permission of the victim. Juvenile delinquency.
Commonwealth v. Fischer
Commonwealth v. Fischer
Reasonable mistake of fact regarding a victim's consent is not a defense to a rape charge. Mens rea.
Clark v. Arizona
Clark v. Arizona
Mott Rule; mental illness short of insanity does not bear on mens rea according to Arizona state Mott Rule; court will not allow evidence of a mental disorder short of insanity as bearing on a defendant's capacity to form specific intent.
M.C. v. Bulgaria
M.C. v. Bulgaria
Essential element of the crime of rape is lack of consent.
Atkins v. Virginia
Atkins v. Virginia
The execution of a mentally retarded person is "cruel and unusual punishment" and therefore violates the Eighth Amendment.
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence
Insanity May Be Proved By Perponderance Of The Evidence
Perez v. Cain; In a federal habeas proceeding, the standard is whether, after viewing evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Question of Possession
Question of Possession
State v. Barger; new technology complicates questions of possession sufficient to establish criminal liability.
Signing With A Fictitious Name
Signing With A Fictitious Name
United States v. Moore; signing for an express mail delivery with a fictitious name violates federal law.
Defense of Habitation
Defense of Habitation
State v. Boyett; entry to home not required for defense of habitation, but habitation defense not applicable if victim was fleeing.
Second Degree Murder
Second Degree Murder
People v. Chun; felony murder; assualtive felony that is inherently dangerous to life; second degree murder; felony murder rule; drive by shooting; accomplice liability.