Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Torts  >  Fair Use Parody
Fair Use Parody
Fair Use Parody Cartoons

Fair Use Parody

Winter v. DC Comics; copyright; the first amendment; appropriation of a likeness; more than merely copying the likenes; right of publicity claim; significant transformative elements; value of work does not derive primarily from celebrity's fame; fair use; parody.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

the firefighter's rule
the firefighter's rule
Levandoski v. Cone; the firefighter's rule does not bar recovery from a tortfeasor who is neither a landowner nor a person in control of the premises; invitee; licensee.
Student Acting Under Doctor Authority Does Not Commit Battery
Student Acting Under Doctor Authority Does Not Commit Battery
Mullins v. Parkview Hospital, Inc; In order to state a claim for battery, the plaintiff must show that the defendant acted intending to cause a harmful or offensive contact with the plaintiff.
No Nominal Damages in Negligence Actions
No Nominal Damages in Negligence Actions
Right v. Breen; when the action sounds in negligence, no purpose would be served by a nominal damages award; exemplary damages.
Premises Liability Waiver Agreement
Premises Liability Waiver Agreement
Dalury v. S-K-I Ltd. An exculpatory agreement requiring skiers to release a ski resort operator from liability for injuries sustained on the property is void as contrary to public policy.
Economic Loss Rule
Economic Loss Rule
Affiliated FM Ins. Co. v. LTK Consulting Services, Inc.; The economic loss rule, a doctrine that has attempted to describe the dividing line between the law of torts and the law of contracts, should not be treated as a bright line rule.
No Claim for Emotional Distress
No Claim for Emotional Distress
Catron v. Lewis; an action for negligent infliction of emotional distress must show either (1) reasonably foreseeably "bystander" victim based on an intimate familial relationship, or (2) a "direct victim" because was within the zone of danger.
Abnormally Dangerous Activity
Abnormally Dangerous Activity
Dyer v. Maine Drilling & Blasting, Inc.; an abnormally dangerous activity is subject to liability for harm to the person, land, or chattels of another from the activity, even if has exercised the utmost care to prevent the harm. Strict Liability.
Shopkeeper's Privilege
Shopkeeper's Privilege
Gortarez v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc.; A merchant with reasonable cause may detain in a reasonable manner and for a reasonable time any person suspected of shoplifting for questioning or summoning a law enforcement officer.
Qualified Immunity
Qualified Immunity
Sama v. Hannigan; Qualified immunity shields government officials performing discretionary functions (medical care here), from liability for civil damages if conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights.
Self Defense for Physical Harm Only
Self Defense for Physical Harm Only
Touchet v. Hampton; mere words, even though designed to excite or irritate, cannot excuse a battery. The privilege of self-defense is based on the prevention of harm to the actor, not on the desire for retaliation or revenge.
Market Share Liability Rule
Market Share Liability Rule
Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories; when the precise defendant cannot be identified through no fault of the plaintiff, liability may be apportioned based on the share of the market held by each negligent manufacturer. Summers v. Tice.
Online Writings are Defamatory
Online Writings are Defamatory
Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. Delfino; written defamatory communications published by means of the Internet are properly characterized as libel, not slander. No prior restraint.

Browse Similar Items