Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Evidence  >  People v. Abbot
People v. Abbot
People v. Abbot Cartoons

People v. Abbot

Evidence that prosecutrix in rape action had prior sexual activities with men is relevant to show consent. Rape shield law.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

In Re Melton
In Re Melton
Expert opinions may be based on hearsay that meets minimum standards of reliability. Civil commitment.
In Re Lindsey
In Re Lindsey
Attorney client privilege does not prevent government lawyers from testifying about possible commission of crimes by other government officials.
United States v. Doe
United States v. Doe
If act of producing documents would be incriminating, production of those documents cannot be compelled without statutory grant of use immunity.
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings
There is no testimonial privilege for parent child communications. Motion to quash.
Campbell v. Delbridge
Campbell v. Delbridge
Emotional distress; issues in medical malpractice case that are only peripheral to medical decisions do not require expert testimony.
Near Miss Doctrine for Hearsay Evidence
Near Miss Doctrine for Hearsay Evidence
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electrical Industrial Co., Ltd; The residual hearsay exceptions should be used very rarely, and only in exceptional and unanticipated circumstances that are not specifically covered by particular exceptions.
Forfeiture By Wrongdoing
Forfeiture By Wrongdoing
Giles v. California; Forfeiture by wrongdoing applies only when defendant engaged or acquiesced in wrongdoing that was intended to, and did, procure unavailability of declarant as witness; domestic volence.
Common Knowledge May Be Considered By Fact Finders
Common Knowledge May Be Considered By Fact Finders
U.S. v. Amado-Nunez; The whole range of human experience, from the rough meaning of common terms to human psychology, and which may properly enter into the fact-finder's decision-making process without the need for direct evidence.
DNA Evidence
DNA Evidence
Brown v. Farwell; A federal court considering a habeas corpus petition may exclude evidence admitted in the state court if the evidence rendered the trial so fundamentally unfair as to violate federal due process; reasonable doubt.
Authentication and Foundation
Authentication and Foundation
Turnage v. State; A duplicate document or recording is admissible to the same extent as the original unless a genuine question is raised about the authenticity of the duplicate or it would be unfair to admit.
Emergency Statements
Emergency Statements
People v. Sergio; Tarasoff exception; statement to the EMT ambulance drivers were not doctor patient privilege; physician patient privilege.
Best Evidence Rule Computer Records
Best Evidence Rule Computer Records
United States v. Diaz-Lopez; best evidence rule does not apply to testimony that records have been examined and found not to contain any reference to a designated matter.