Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Torts  >  Security Guards May Pursue Fleeing Suspects
Security Guards May Pursue Fleeing Suspects
Security Guards May Pursue Fleeing Suspects Cartoons

Security Guards May Pursue Fleeing Suspects

Peters v. Menard, Inc; A merchant and its agents are immune from liability for actions taken while attempting to detain a person, including off-premises pursuit of that person, if reasonable cause to believe person violated the shoplifting law.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

res ipsa loquitur
res ipsa loquitur
States v. Lourdes Hospital; doctrine of res ipsa loquitor; factfinder; draw an inference of negligence; kind that ordinarily does not occur absent negligence.
Violation of Statute May Be Negligence Per Se
Violation of Statute May Be Negligence Per Se
O'Guin v. Bingham County; to replace a common law duty of care with a duty of care from a statute or regulation, the statute or regulation must clearly define the required standard of conduct, be intended to prevent the same type of harm.
Premises Liability Waiver Agreement
Premises Liability Waiver Agreement
Dalury v. S-K-I Ltd. An exculpatory agreement requiring skiers to release a ski resort operator from liability for injuries sustained on the property is void as contrary to public policy.
Proximate Cause Only If Foreseeable
Proximate Cause Only If Foreseeable
Hebert v. Enos. Summary judgment is appropriate if the plaintiff's injuries were not a foreseeable result of the defendant's negligence.
Federal Tort Claims Act
Federal Tort Claims Act
United States v. Olsen. The Federal Tort Claims Act authorizes civil actions against the United States under circumstances in which a private person would be liable under the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.
Res Ipsa Loquitur in Med Mal
Res Ipsa Loquitur in Med Mal
Sides v. St. Anthony's Medical Center. A plaintiff in a medical malpractice case can use res ipsa loquitur theory where the plaintiff offers a medical expert's opinion that the injury would not have occurred in the absence of negligence by the defendant.
NTMVSA
NTMVSA
Doomes v. Best Transit Corp.; the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act includes a savings clause stating that compliance with a motor vehicle safety standard does not exempt liability at common law. Premeption Doctrine.
No Duty to Assist
No Duty to Assist
Estate of Cilley v. Lane; Maine law does not impose a general obligation to protect others from harm not created by the actor.
Discovery Rule
Discovery Rule
Lincoln Electric Co. v. McLemore; A plaintiff's cause of action accrues at the point at which he discovered, or by reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury. Statute of limitations.
Intervening Acts
Intervening Acts
Marcus v. Staubs; a tortfeasor whose negligence is a substantial factor in bringing about injuries is not relieved from liability by the intervening acts of third persons if those acts were reasonably foreseeable by the original tortfeasor.
Intervening Cause
Intervening Cause
Pohl v. County of Furnas; an intervening cause cuts off a tortfeasor's liability only when it is not foreseeable; tthe new and independent conduct of a third person is itself the proximate cause of the injury and breaks the causal connection.
Online Defamation
Online Defamation
Blumenthal v. Drudge; Under the Communications Decency Act, no provider or user of interactive computer service treated as publisher or speaker of information provided by another content provider for tort liability. ISP. Internet Service Provider.