Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Law  >  State v. Larson
State v. Larson
State v. Larson Cartoons

State v. Larson

Recklessness is conscious and unjustifiable disregard of substantial risk that offender's conduct may cause certain result or may be of certain nature. Reckless disregard.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Rex v. Chisser
Rex v. Chisser
Taking goods without paying for them is treated as a felony even though the store clerk voluntarily handed the merchandise to the customer for inspection as part of an anticipated transaction. Felleo amimo incohate.
The Rule of Lenity
The Rule of Lenity
United States v. Dauray, The rule of lenity requires that ambiguities in a criminal statute be resolved in the defendant's favor, noscitur a socis.
Hines v. State
Hines v. State
Felonies that create a foreseeable risk of death under the circumstances are inherently dangerous, justifying the felony-murder rule.
People v. Goetz
People v. Goetz
Self defense, The reasonableness of a belief in the need to use force is determined according to an objective standard, taking into account the circumstances or situation faced by the defendant.
Linda R. S. v. Richard D.
Linda R. S. v. Richard D.
A plaintiff must have a sufficient stake in the outcome of a case to maintain standing.
Withdrawing From Consipiracy Requires Affirmative Act
Withdrawing From Consipiracy Requires Affirmative Act
State v. Formella; An individual is criminally liable for the conduct of another when he acts as an accomplice by promoting or facilitating, or by aiding, or agreeing or attempting to aid, another person in planning or committing the offense.
Felony Murder Rule
Felony Murder Rule
People v. Cavitt; The felony-murder rule requires both a causal relationship and a temporal relationship between the underlying felony and the act resulting in death.
Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice
Document Destruction Policies Not Obstruction of Justice
Arthur Andersen LLP v. United States; One knowingly corruptly persuades another person with intent to cause that person to withhold documents from, or alter documents for use in, an official proceeding only when conscious of wrongdoing.
Mental Illness Evidence Does Not Bear On Mens Rea
Mental Illness Evidence Does Not Bear On Mens Rea
Clark v. Arizona; The defendant appealed from his murder conviction, arguing that evidence of his mental illness should have been considered with regard to his ability to form the necessary mens rea.
Viability Standard for Fetus
Viability Standard for Fetus
Keeler v. Superior Court; viability of the embryo was not the standard for human being in California in the 1970's.
Second Degree Murder
Second Degree Murder
People v. Chun; felony murder; assualtive felony that is inherently dangerous to life; second degree murder; felony murder rule; drive by shooting; accomplice liability.
Sentencing Guideline Range
Sentencing Guideline Range
United States v. Bernard Madoff; While the court must give the sentencing guideline range fair and respectful consideration, it is not bound by it and must make an individualized sentencing assessment.