Shopping Bag

0 item(s) in cart/ total: $0    view cart
Free Instant Delivery  |  No Sales Tax
Home > Case Law > Criminal Evidenced & Procedure  >  Rakas v. Illinois
Rakas v. Illinois
Rakas v. Illinois Cartoons

Rakas v. Illinois

To sustain a fourth amendment challenge, a defendant must establish a legitimate expectation of privacy in the areas searched or in the items seized. Seizure standing.
Your Price: $10.00

Select Usage (details) :

Related Cartoons

Jackson v. Virginia
Jackson v. Virginia
A review of the sufficiency of the evidence to support a criminal conviction requires a determination as to whether the record evidence could reasonably support a finding of guilt beyond a "reasonable doubt" standard.
Wainwright v. Sykes
Wainwright v. Sykes
Contemporaneous objection rule. absent a showing of cause and prejudice attendant to a state procedural waiver, a federal habeas corpus review of a waived objection to the admission of a confession at trial is barred. Coram nobis.
Hector (A Slave) v. State
Hector (A Slave) v. State
Coerced confession offered under the influence of pain are inadmissible; torture; interrogation; court must decide whether a confession was voluntary.
Oregon v. Elstad
Oregon v. Elstad
Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine aplies to Fourth amendment, not Fifth Amendment; although Miranda requires the suppression of an un-warned admission, the admissibility of any subsequent statement turns on whether it was made voluntarily.
Defendant Consent to Unrepresented Interrogation
Defendant Consent to Unrepresented Interrogation
Montejo v. Louisiana; A criminal defendant's consent to police-initiated interrogation cannot be presumed involuntary simply because the court previously appointed a lawyer to represent him; preliminary hearing.
Sentencing Judges May Consider Various Factors
Sentencing Judges May Consider Various Factors
Kimbrough v. United States; Under Booker, the cocaine Guidelines, like all other Sentencing Guidelines, are advisory only.
Can Impeach with Inadmissable Evidence
Can Impeach with Inadmissable Evidence
Kansas v. Ventris; An informant's testimony, elicited in violation of the Sixth Amendment, is admissible to challenge the defendant's inconsistent testimony at trial; impeach.
Knock and Announce
Knock and Announce
United States v. Banks; Fourth Amendment; officers knocked and announced and then forcibly entered after reasonable suspicion of exigency had ripened.
Special Needs Search
Special Needs Search
Ferguson v. City of Charleston; drug test of a pregnant woman in a doctor's office is not a special needs search.
Detain Aliens
Detain Aliens
Demore v. Kim; aliens may be detained pending removal deportation.
Exigent Circumstances Rule
Exigent Circumstances Rule
Kentucky v. King; The exigent-circumstances rule applies only when the police do not gain entry to the premises by means of an actual or threatened violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Inffective Assistance of Counsel Standard
Inffective Assistance of Counsel Standard
Premo v. Moore; The Sixth Amendment requires reasonable competence in representing the accused, but substantial deference must be afforded to counsel's judgment. Habeas relief standard. Supress confession.